anonniemouse (
anonniemouse) wrote in
tf_talk2015-04-16 10:55 am
Entry tags:
Gloves Off
Please use this post for discussion of those contentious, murky, triggering issues too complex to discuss/moderate on the main post.
Note that this post is NOT a free-for-all and will still be modded for slurs, namecalling, doxxing and trolling. But fair warning that it will not be moderated for discussion of issues some find triggering (trans issues, mental illness, etc.) and that if you choose to participate here, you do so at your own risk.
Note that this post is NOT a free-for-all and will still be modded for slurs, namecalling, doxxing and trolling. But fair warning that it will not be moderated for discussion of issues some find triggering (trans issues, mental illness, etc.) and that if you choose to participate here, you do so at your own risk.

Re: Self-Loathing as an Art Form
(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 11:28 am (UTC)(link)I'm not talking about *questioning* his identity. As both you and I said, it's damn obvious that he's a trans man, even if he cannot bring himself to face that fact. I'm only talking about not shying away from *considering* his identity as a self-denying trans man when it's relevant to the abuse he's committing.
he is a man and that's all there is to say about it
I really can't agree with that. He's a trans man, and both parts of this identity play a heavy role in his abusive ways.
he would be an abuser whether trans or not so it just doesn't seem relevant.
It's highly relevant because he made it highly relevant by using his being a trans man to abuse people and to deny his abusive past. If he had never used his being trans to do anything wrong, then I would agree that it's irrelevant. But since he's repeatedly used his being trans to lie, hide, and abuse people, it's become very much relevant.
I'll be honest: I don't even understand how we can still be discussing this. How can something he's repeatedly used to hide and to abuse people NOT be relevant when discussing his lies and abuse?? What does "relevant" even mean then, if not "something directly related to the topic being discussed"? What DO you consider relevant when discussing Andy Blake's abuse and lies, and why, if something he's used so much and so often to nefarious ends isn't relevant to you?
Re: Self-Loathing as an Art Form
(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 11:45 am (UTC)(link)Apples and oranges.
Re: Self-Loathing as an Art Form
(Anonymous) 2015-06-17 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)There's literally no post in this thread saying that, so what are you talking about??