What the fuck? Here's one of Andy's friends blatantly lying and then standing by the lie (a lie that if it were true could cause grave legal trouble) because reasons:
NL: ...From all accounts (including her own) Andy’s misadventures with his ex, Abbey, seem at least as much her responsibility as his, if anything, because she was an adult at the time and he was a minor.
Abbey:: He absolutely was not a minor. He was 18 when we met online and 19 when we met in person. These are documented facts. It is a baldfaced proven lie that he was a minor.
...Several people, including Andy's defenders, acknowledge that, no, Andy was not a minor at the time and that yes, NL wrote that he was..
NL: I’m not going to change my statement. He may not have been a minor (the cut off on that changes from place to place), but he was a teenager. And Abbey (nice to meet you) you were not, correct? You were an adult by every legal definition.
Re: Andy FAQ Facebook page
NL: ...From all accounts (including her own) Andy’s misadventures with his ex, Abbey, seem at least as much her responsibility as his, if anything, because she was an adult at the time and he was a minor.
Abbey:: He absolutely was not a minor. He was 18 when we met online and 19 when we met in person. These are documented facts. It is a baldfaced proven lie that he was a minor.
...Several people, including Andy's defenders, acknowledge that, no, Andy was not a minor at the time and that yes, NL wrote that he was..
NL: I’m not going to change my statement. He may not have been a minor (the cut off on that changes from place to place), but he was a teenager. And Abbey (nice to meet you) you were not, correct? You were an adult by every legal definition.