Nope, he's still defending Andy in the FAQ comments:https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=481374795634805&id=474738532965098
(and hiding some dissenting ones, I think? It looks like he's responding to someone but I can't see what) saying that the Andy blogs, and not Andy"s own behavior, caused him to lose a job ("job") and housing. I assume Andy explained away all the inconsistencies somehow.
Also Winnjennister is in the comments. Poor Winnjester.
no subject
(and hiding some dissenting ones, I think? It looks like he's responding to someone but I can't see what) saying that the Andy blogs, and not Andy"s own behavior, caused him to lose a job ("job") and housing. I assume Andy explained away all the inconsistencies somehow.
Also Winnjennister is in the comments. Poor Winnjester.