anonniemouse: (Default)
anonniemouse ([personal profile] anonniemouse) wrote in [community profile] tf_talk2015-04-09 12:58 pm

continued Thatfucker discussion

Since we've been kicked off FFA for the week, please feel free to continue the anon discussion here. Apologies if this is a big flop - I've never made a DW community before!

The rules are vaguely the same as they are over on FFA. Please refrain from being too much of an asshole, making personal attacks, posting identifying information or engaging in transfail.

ETA: If there's information you'd like to see archived (journal/blog posts related to Andy, etc.), please dump it here and link to it from the main post for discussing.

Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 11:51 am (UTC)(link)
From the same post: I don’t know if I’d say she was “attacked” or that all the comments were out of line.

Also: I don’t wholly agree with Meg’s take on her situation. That doesn’t mean she’s wrong, or that she “should” consider herself a “victim.” That means my experiences lead me to different conclusions, and that what I take away from her words isn’t necessarily what she meant. Who’s right? Doesn’t matter for now.

Which seems, to me, to suggest that if you disagree with Abbey on her interpretation of events, that's fine. She sounds to me like she's pretty well owning her reaction as just that -- her own. So I think those parts are worth quoting as well.

(frozen comment) Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Which seems, to me, to suggest that if you disagree with Abbey on her interpretation of events, that's fine. She sounds to me like she's pretty well owning her reaction as just that -- her own.

So the answer to my question - Where are the surprisingly hostile and defensive comments - is, in fact, "There are none. But we love Abbey so we aren't going to disagree with her statement that there were comments like that."

Okay then.

(frozen comment) Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
lol ok, bb, sure.

(frozen comment) Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."

(Anonymous) 2015-05-06 10:31 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, indeed.