anonniemouse (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
anonniemouse) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
tf_talk2015-04-09 12:58 pm
anonniemouse) wrote in tf_talk2015-04-09 12:58 pm
Entry tags:
continued Thatfucker discussion
Since we've been kicked off FFA for the week, please feel free to continue the anon discussion here. Apologies if this is a big flop - I've never made a DW community before!
The rules are vaguely the same as they are over on FFA. Please refrain from being too much of an asshole, making personal attacks, posting identifying information or engaging in transfail.
ETA: If there's information you'd like to see archived (journal/blog posts related to Andy, etc.), please dump it here and link to it from the main post for discussing.
The rules are vaguely the same as they are over on FFA. Please refrain from being too much of an asshole, making personal attacks, posting identifying information or engaging in transfail.
ETA: If there's information you'd like to see archived (journal/blog posts related to Andy, etc.), please dump it here and link to it from the main post for discussing.
Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."
(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)That out of the way, I thought her response was measured and well-reasoned. I don't necessarily agree with it down to the letter but I don't feel the need to, either. Disagreement and debate can be healthy if done in a healthy way, which I think Abbey's post was. I don't want to bang around in an echo chamber.
I have zero problems with genuine, good faith arguments.