anonniemouse: (Default)
anonniemouse ([personal profile] anonniemouse) wrote in [community profile] tf_talk2015-04-09 12:58 pm

continued Thatfucker discussion

Since we've been kicked off FFA for the week, please feel free to continue the anon discussion here. Apologies if this is a big flop - I've never made a DW community before!

The rules are vaguely the same as they are over on FFA. Please refrain from being too much of an asshole, making personal attacks, posting identifying information or engaging in transfail.

ETA: If there's information you'd like to see archived (journal/blog posts related to Andy, etc.), please dump it here and link to it from the main post for discussing.

Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."

(Anonymous) 2015-05-05 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
It wasn't a specific comment, it was how the overall tone felt. To me. In my own opinion. Which is mine only. YMMV. You don't need to agree with my opinion. Also, it's one conversation of many.

I think this entire thing has gotten blown out of proportion. That is also my opinion that is mine only.loop

KQ.
(Apparently the Q is for Queen of the Internet? I can live with that)

Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."

(Anonymous) 2015-05-06 10:32 am (UTC)(link)
The "tone" was surprisingly hostile and defensive?

Okay, sure.

Re: "I think discussion about Meg oh tf-talk was surprisingly hostile and defensive."

(Anonymous) 2015-05-06 11:22 am (UTC)(link)
She's allowed to have her own opinion on it. For the record, she's not the only one who found the tone hostile.