anonniemouse (
anonniemouse) wrote in
tf_talk2015-04-16 10:55 am
Entry tags:
Gloves Off
Please use this post for discussion of those contentious, murky, triggering issues too complex to discuss/moderate on the main post.
Note that this post is NOT a free-for-all and will still be modded for slurs, namecalling, doxxing and trolling. But fair warning that it will not be moderated for discussion of issues some find triggering (trans issues, mental illness, etc.) and that if you choose to participate here, you do so at your own risk.
Note that this post is NOT a free-for-all and will still be modded for slurs, namecalling, doxxing and trolling. But fair warning that it will not be moderated for discussion of issues some find triggering (trans issues, mental illness, etc.) and that if you choose to participate here, you do so at your own risk.

Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-19 10:30 am (UTC)(link)That's interesting, because normally Andy is the definition of TMI. On his tumblr alone he's posted his real name, his phone number, his address, his parent's names, his so-called mental health diagnoses, the "facts" that he was a sex worker and a rape victim, and a bunch of different versions of his entire life story. He's even described himself as abusive and a rapist.
So why the fuck would he care if people know what meds he's on?
Unless, you know, they'd reveal he's being treated for entirely different conditions than the ones he claims to have.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-19 10:58 am (UTC)(link)I'm definitely not new to the Andy canon, but when/how does he claim to have been a sex worker?
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-19 11:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-19 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)Thanks for the receipts! And D: at them, of course.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-19 11:29 am (UTC)(link)What's for sure is that if they supported his claims of being treated for schizophrenia, he wouldn't show-but-really-hide them like that. He'd be more than happy to display them front and center.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-19 11:47 am (UTC)(link)Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 04:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)TBH, it reassures me somewhat, because for a while I was worried that he'd managed to get some anti-psychotics from his docs and was stopping and starting them as he needed to in order to keep up his ruse - you only really see that instant reaction to not taking them that he describes when they're not needed, as the brain realigns itself in a hurry; if you do need them to keep your brain level they tend to titrate out slowly as they get used up.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)I can see no reason why he wouldn't say which meds he takes if he were really psychotic. What people don't want to share when they hide their meds is their illness, not the meds themselves. If someone has lithium in their medicine cabinet, and doesn't want people to know that they are bipolar, then it makes sense to blank that detail out. But once you've shared your diagnosis, the meds themselves have no more meaning than if they were aspirin for headaches. They don't reveal anything new, so there's no reason to hide them.
On the other hand, if he pretends to be psychotic, but doesn't have any anti-psychotics in his medicine cabinet...
(Now that we've discussed this, anyone wanna take bets on how long it's going to take him to casually drop the name of some anti-psychotic in an unrelated post, or anything of the sort?)
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)(IDK, he hasn't taken the bait other times).
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)Yes, this, thank you! I knew I wasn't saying exactly what I meant, but I couldn't figure out what was missing. It's what you point out: he's constantly and freely oversharing. But suddenly, on this particular point, he stalls for no apparent reason. Many people knowledgeable about psychosis have pointed out that nothing in his psychosis narrative holds up, and he could easily introduce a shred of truth into it by simply sharing which meds he's taking. This is what he would do on any other topic, but he does the opposite on this one, going so far as showing a bunch of meds but hiding what they are. This only reinforces the idea that his psychosis narrative is a lie, which is an odd thing for him to do.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)Already happened. He complained about craving carbs on Seroquel.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)Methinks somebody's half-assing his research again.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)Went and did something else, and then I had to come back because I'm still really hung up on the idea that a top notch psych team, with a bajillion degrees between them, put a trans man with a history of suicide on a drug known for suicidal ideation and 'man-boobs' as a first line attempt at medication - it takes weeks to try, and then weeks to come off, a new drug regimen; there simply isn't enough time in his "I'm fixed!" narrative to try a reasonable number of other drugs before seroquel.
I know kickbacks have wrought havoc on the US medical system, yet still I boggle.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)The history of suicide would be a major concern, I agree, but the 'man-boobs', not so much. Either he hasn't had top surgery, in which case he still has his female boobs anyway, or he's had a double mastectomy, in which case there are no more mammary glands to create any man-boobs to begin with. Either way, not a problem in his case - unless Seroquel can also make female boobs grow bigger? Because *that* could be a problem all right if he's still binding!
I also agree that I wouldn't expect Seroquel to be the first line of treatment for a newly diagnosed case of schizophrenia, AND that he left no room in his recovery narrative for other drugs to be tried first. None of this adds up.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)There's also that it's generally better for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and Andy only claims to experience the positive ones, which there are better anti-psychotics for.
Like, dude, seriously, you couldn't have looked into it a little more than picking out a random schizophrenia drug?
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 02:12 am (UTC)(link)Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 02:27 am (UTC)(link)Like, I don't believe he's telling the truth, but if he is then HE NEEDS NEW DOCTORS because these ones are total fuck ups. Either they've taken him on and off other meds potentially-fatally quickly to reach seroquel so fast, or they went with a messed up choice really early on.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 03:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Either his care team are even shittier than previously believed, or something stinks to high heaven.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-25 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)Do you mind if I ask for a link? Because I tried searching for it, and I first came accross this post: http://andythanfiction.tumblr.com/post/88183520079/want-real-information-about-psychiatric-drugs , which couldn't be more weirdly appropriate, especially considering it was posted 10 months ago. But then I found this post: http://andythanfiction.tumblr.com/post/44287839715/19th-nervous-breakdown from "two years ago", which sent me straight into RAGE mode, so I don't think I want to go looking for more.
So, er, link please, if you have one?
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 02:31 am (UTC)(link)So, in trying to find assistance with/stretch my meds until my health insurance for new job kicks in, I’ve recently gone to an off-brand version of Seroquel. And in the past few days, I have started having the most overwhelming, extreme urges to absolutely binge on carbs. I’m not talking increased appetite…that’s remained stable.
[Bullshit continues for another few paragraphs]
Technically this would not be Seroquel proper since he's taking a generic version, but Seroquel is just a brand/trade name. The actual drug's name is quetiapine, and the generic version should (in theory) be identical to the original.
Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 02:36 am (UTC)(link)Re: Peter Pandy
(Anonymous) 2015-04-26 08:49 am (UTC)(link)Thank you! And yeah, I know about generic versions: it's compulsory to use them when available in my country, except for a handful of meds where it's been determined through experience that somehow changing from the brand name to the generic has an actual negative influence on the patients (like my Levothyrox, for example). If you insist on taking the brand name anyway, then the difference in price between the generic and the brand name is on you (ie. it cannot be reimbursed by the state Social Security).
About the rest of the post:
1. Let me roll my eyes at how he describes carb cravings as though they were something nobody else ever had experienced. Even Andy Blake's completely common carb cravings are Speshul Carb-Craving Snowflakes.
2. It makes me angry the way he badmouthes the hotline nurse he supposedly called for help:
I have never had anything remotely like this. This is not a “relapse” or an “episode” (thank you hotline nurse for assuming I’m lying about that ) of an eating disorder because I’ve never had one.
So sorry, poor baby, that the hotline nurse tried to DO HER JOB. People lie all the time about having had an ED, and it often takes several times asking them before they admit to it. Checking to make damn sure that there isn't a history of ED even several years past is what she's supposed to do. But I suppose she should have been able to read Mr Snowflake's mind instead.
3. Mind you, this is the same person who is apparently *appalled* that common side-effects of meds should also apply to him:
I called the pharmacy and the service that’s helping me get the meds and all they say is that “significant weight gain is sometimes a side effect.” And it’s like…ok, no shit, Sherlock, if I gave in to this crap I’d blow up like a fucking Macy’s balloon, but WTF?!?
What "WTF?" ? Which part of "it makes you eat like Hell and gain tons of weight" doesn't he understand, exactly? And what does he expect anyone to do about a side-effect which greatly inconveniences everyone who experiences it, but so far nobody has been able to treat? It's like he thinks that they should find a solution *just for him*. Egocentric like woah.